[Solved] Price history for Canon EOS R5 Mark II?

quick reply while i have a sec... honestly i've been through this before with previous releases and unfortunately it's not just the sticker price that gets you. i had some really bad issues with using older cards that i thought would be fine. turns out, even if they fit in the slot, the Canon EOS R5 Mark II just kept freezing up on me during important shoots. it was super frustrating. i really wanted to save some cash by not upgrading everything at once, but it just wasn't as good as expected. basically, you gotta be really careful about trying to cut corners. i've seen people lose data because the speeds couldn't keep up with the new sensor... just a heads up to factor that into your budget, dont let a 'deal' on the body lure you into skipping the proper media. i'm around if you want more details on the stuff that failed for me.

Ok so, I’ve been trying to track this too, but one thing that’s really confusing me as a bit of a newbie is the whole "extra" price of compatibility. Like, I’ve been reading that even if you find a good deal on the Canon EOS R5 Mark II body, the total price might be way higher because of the new accessories you'll need. Apparently, it really needs that specific Canon LP-E6P battery to actually use the fastest features and the new AI autofocus stuff? Honestly, I'm worried my old batteries won't really cut it if I'm losing out on the cool tech I'm paying for. Does anyone know if the price of the new Canon BG-R20 Battery Grip usually drops alongside the camera, or do those stay expensive forever? Tbh, I usually keep an eye on CamelCamelCamel or even PriceSpy to see when things shift. It’s basically a waiting game, but I’m mostly just stressed about whether my old gear is even compatible or if I'm basically starting from scratch. Is it even worth the upgrade if I have to replace every single battery I own?

Hey there! Oh man, trying to predict the R5 Mark II pricing is a bit like trying to catch lightning in a bottle, isn't it? From what I remember with the original R5, it launched pretty darn high, as you'd expect for a flagship. I think it was around $3900 USD initially, and honestly, for the first few months, there weren't any earth-shattering deals to speak of. Canon usually holds firm on their new pro gear for a while.

My advice? If you're budgeting, you might want to consider that the initial price will likely be right up there. Don't expect deep discounts right at launch. I'd suggest keeping an eye on major retailers, but also look at places that sometimes bundle accessories. Sometimes those 'deals' aren't direct price drops but come with a nice battery grip or a memory card. Be careful with third-party sellers too, make sure they're reputable. I've learned over the years that patience can pay off, but with a hot new release, it's a gamble. Good luck with the budgeting!

Hey there! So, jumping into the R5 Mark II pricing speculation from a technical angle, it's worth looking at what drives these pro bodies. Honestly, predicting exact launch prices is tricky, but we can infer some trends based on the R5's original positioning and what's happening with sensor technology and processing power.

When the original R5 launched, it was pretty much *the* flagship for Canon's mirrorless line, packed with bleeding-edge features like 8K video and that incredible autofocus. Because of that, it landed at a premium price point, around $3,899 USD body-only. There weren't really *major* discounts right out of the gate; Canon tends to hold firm on their latest pro gear initially. Any "deals" were usually bundled with lenses or accessories, or very minor price drops after a few months when initial demand settled.

Now, for the Mark II, here's where it gets interesting from a technical standpoint. If they're pushing for significantly higher resolution sensors (think 60MP+), or even more advanced stacked sensor tech for insane burst rates, that hardware alone drives up manufacturing costs. Also, the processing power needed for things like improved AI subject tracking and more robust internal recording codecs (like 12-bit RAW at higher frame rates) also adds to the bill of materials. So, while the first reply mentioned trying to catch lightning, I'd add that the *quality* of that lightning might be more expensive to harness this time around.

Given that, I'd be cautiously conservative here. Expect the R5 Mark II's launch price to be *at least* on par with, if not slightly higher than, the original R5's launch price. Maybe closer to the $4,000-$4,500 USD mark initially, depending on how much they innovate. Don't expect steep discounts in the first 6-12 months, especially if it's a significant upgrade. My advice? If you're on a strict budget, consider waiting for a year post-launch or looking at refurbished options if reliability isn't a *critical* concern for your immediate needs. Or, perhaps, explore the R6 Mark II if its specs meet your core requirements – it's a fantastic camera and has seen more price fluctuations over time. It's always wise to have a buffer in your budget for these high-end releases!

Hey everyone! So, I totally get wanting to pin down the R5 Mark II pricing, and it's smart to look at past trends. While everyone's been focused on Canon's internal pricing strategies (which, yeah, is important!), I've found it super insightful to look at how other brands handle their flagship releases, especially when a direct competitor pops up.

Think about it: when a major player like Sony or Nikon drops a beast of a camera that directly challenges Canon's top-tier offerings, it can really shake up the market. Sometimes, to stay competitive or to grab market share, manufacturers might adjust launch prices or offer more aggressive early bird deals than they otherwise would. It's like a quiet price war that isn't always advertised.

So, while budgeting for the R5's original launch price is a solid baseline, I'd also keep an eye on what Sony's A7R V or Nikon's Z8/Z9 are doing price-wise around the time the R5 Mark II is rumored. It might give us a hint if Canon feels the pressure to be more aggressive with their own pricing or bundles. Just a thought from a fellow gear enthusiast trying to make sense of it all! Hope this helps a bit with the budgeting puzzle!

Hey there! Oh, trying to nail down those R5 Mark II prices, I totally get it. It’s like a puzzle, isn’t it? While everyone’s talking launch prices and dealer markups, I’ve been thinking about a different angle for budgeting – the DIY route, if you will.

Honestly, looking at the longevity of gear and potential savings down the line, I’ve found that for some folks, waiting a bit and then considering *used* or even refurbished pro bodies can be a fantastic way to save a chunk of change. I’ve snagged some amazing deals on cameras that were only a generation or two old, and they’ve worked like a charm for years. I'm still happily using my old 5D Mark IV, picked it up used a few years back, and it hasn't missed a beat.

So, while the R5 Mark II will likely debut with a hefty price tag, don't discount the power of patience and the used market. It might not be a direct price history for the *new* model, but it’s a budget-friendly strategy I’ve relied on time and time again. Happy shooting, whatever you decide!

Hey there! Honestly, I'd budget for the R5 Mark II landing around the original R5's launch price of $3,899 USD. In my experience, Canon tends to keep those flagship prices pretty stable, especially early on. Look for bundle deals or refurbished options after the first year for potential savings.

Hey there! Thinking about the R5 Mark II pricing, I totally get wanting to budget. But honestly, from my perspective as someone who really values gear reliability, the initial price point for these high-end bodies is less about a 'deal' and more about the investment in cutting-edge tech and, critically, stability.

When the original R5 launched, sure, the price was steep at $3,899 USD. But what I was happy to pay for was the assurance that Canon had worked out any significant kinks. I've seen too many photographers burned by early adoption issues – overheating, firmware bugs, you name it. For me, paying full price upfront means I'm getting a camera that's been thoroughly tested and is less likely to cause downtime or expensive repairs down the line. That peace of mind is worth its weight in gold, especially when you're relying on your equipment for professional work. So, while discounts are nice, I'd be looking at that launch price as the cost of a robust, dependable tool, not necessarily a starting point for negotiation.