Finally got my hands on an R6 and I am prepping for a three-week trip to Japan this June. I really want to travel light so I am strictly looking for a one lens to rule them all type of setup because my back already hates me and I just know if I bring a bag of primes I wont actually use them lol.
Currently torn between these two:
I keep leaning toward the 24-105 because of the constant f/4 and that weather sealing since I am kinda worried about June rain in Tokyo but then I see the 240mm reach on the other one and I think about those compression shots I could get. But is the image quality on the 24-240 actually good enough for the R6 sensor? I have about $1300 to spend max and I can find both around that price if I go used or refurbished. I mainly do street photography and some landscapes but also want to snap some decent food photos in the markets without being too intrusive.
Will I regret not having that extra 135mm of reach if I go with the L lens? Or is the 24-240 just too much of a compromise on sharpness when it gets dark?...
I would suggest the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM.