Which prime lens is...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Which prime lens is best for portrait photography on Canon DSLR cameras?

5 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
76 Views
0
Topic starter

Hey everyone! I’ve been shooting with my Canon Rebel for about a year now using the standard 18-55mm kit lens, but I’m really looking to step up my portrait game. I love those professional-looking shots with the creamy, blurred-out backgrounds (the bokeh!), and I’ve heard that switching to a prime lens is the best way to achieve that.

I’ve been doing some research, but I’m feeling a bit stuck between a few options. The 'nifty fifty' (50mm f/1.8) is obviously the most budget-friendly, but I’ve also seen a lot of photographers raving about the 85mm f/1.8 for its compression and flattering look on faces. Since I’m shooting on an APS-C crop sensor, I’m worried the 85mm might be a bit too tight for indoor sessions. On the other hand, is the 50mm sharp enough for high-quality portraits, or should I save up longer for the f/1.4 version?

I’m mainly focusing on headshots and half-body shots of my family. My budget is around $300-$500, and I’m definitely open to looking at used gear if it means getting better glass. For those of you who have stuck with Canon DSLRs, which prime lens do you think offers the best bang for your buck for portraits?


5 Answers
11

ngl id stick with the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM... the f/1.4 has reliability issues and the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art is overkill. ask a pro, but it’s ur safest bet.


10

In my experience, you should probably stick with the 50mm for now. I've been shooting with Canon for over a decade, and while the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM is a legendary portrait lens, it's highkey risky for indoor sessions on an APS-C sensor. You'll literally be backing into walls just to fit a half-body shot lol. I'd actually recommend the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM over the f/1.4. I'm all about reliability, and the f/1.4 has a notoriously fragile AF motor that fails easily if you bump it. Honestly, the STM version is safer and the sharpness is basically pro-level anyway. For family portraits, the 50mm is the safest bet for your budget and sensor size. It's worked well for me for years with no complaints tho. gl!


2

> Since I’m shooting on an APS-C crop sensor, I’m worried the 85mm might be a bit too tight for indoor sessions. Just found this thread! Tbh I found the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM way better for home shots. I tried the Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM first, but it was a struggle... I was basically in the hallway! The Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM is nicer, but maybe not worth the extra cash if ur on a budget? idk...


2

Can confirm this works. Did the same thing on mine and its been solid ever since.


1

sooo agree with the first guy... the 85mm is basically a telescope indoors on a crop sensor. I went through this last year and honestly, I was literally backing into walls to get a half-body shot lol. I mean, the 1.6x crop factor makes it feel huge! Anyway, I ended up sticking with the 50mm and the bokeh is actually SO much better than the kit lens. Honestly satisfied with that setup for family stuff.


Share:
PhotographyPanel.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy