Which carrying case...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Which carrying case is most durable for the DJI RS 3 gimbal?

4 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
24 Views
0
Topic starter

So I just got the RS 3 and need a serious case because Im doing a wedding shoot in Colorado in like two weeks and I know Im gonna be tossing my gear around in a rental van. I was looking at the Nanuk 930 since people say its basically bulletproof but then I saw some reviews for the PGYTECH carrying case and now Im just torn. My logic was that the hard shell is better for travel but the Nanuk looks freaking huge and I dont want to be lugging a literal suitcase for just a gimbal. The official DJI case feels kinda flimsy like it wouldnt survive a drop. Budget is around $130. Is the Nanuk overkill or is there something else thats tough but more low profile?


4 Answers
12

Building on the earlier suggestion, the Nanuk is amazing but I totally get the size issue if youre cramming gear into a rental van! If you want that bulletproof vibe but in a tighter package, I swear by the HPRC 2400 for DJI RS 3. It is a freaking tank!

  • HPRC 2400 for DJI RS 3: This thing is lighter than the Nanuk but way tougher than the stock DJI bag. The resin is super high-impact and the foam cutouts are laser precise for the RS 3. Its my absolute favorite for field work tho.
  • Pelican 1450 Case with Foam: Classic for a reason. Its a bit heavier than some others but you could basically drop it off a mountain in Colorado and your gimbal would be totally fine.
  • STARTRC RS 3 Waterproof Hard Case: If you want to save some cash but still get a hard shell, this one is surprisingly decent. Its way more low profile than the 930 which makes it easier to pack in tight spots. Honestly just go for the HPRC. Its the sweet spot for durability and size... itll survive anything Colorado throws at it! Love it!


12

^ This. Also, if you want to look at the actual data, it basically comes down to the material specs. The Nanuk is great but the footprint is a legitimate concern for travel. I did a deep dive into the specs for a few others recently and two stood out for that mid-range budget.

  • Lykus Titan MA300 Hard Case for DJI RS 3: This uses a high-grade polypropylene shell with an IP67 rating. Its exterior dimensions are about 14 x 11 x 5 inches, which is noticeably slimmer than the Nanuk. The foam density is high enough to prevent shifting during high-vibration transport.
  • Smatree DH100 Hard Case for DJI RS 3: This one uses ABS plastic which is lighter but has a slightly lower impact resistance than polypropylene. However, it fits the RS 3 plus the focus motor and cables very tightly. Its a good middle ground if you want to stay under that 130 mark. If you want to compare the durability properly, I usually check the data sheets on the B and H website under the specs tab... they list the exact weight and internal dimensions which are crucial. The PGYTECH case you saw is actually a soft-shell hybrid, so the puncture resistance is way lower than these hard cases. For a wedding shoot in a crowded van, id stick with a hard shell like the Lykus. Its a tank but fits in a gear bag way easier than a Nanuk would, tbh.


4

To add to the point above: I have to respectfully disagree with the idea of buying a dedicated hard case just for the gimbal. Over the years, I've tried many different setups and I eventually realized that carrying five or six individual bulletproof cases is just a recipe for a backache and a lot of wasted time. I remember one gig where I spent more time tetrising my gear into the van than actually shooting because every piece of kit had its own massive plastic shell. It looked professional but was a total logistical nightmare. In my experience, you're better off getting a solid, high-quality padded rolling bag that can fit the gimbal along with your bodies and lenses. It is way more practical for fast-paced weddings. The DJI case is definitely thin, but if you nestle it inside a larger, well-padded gear bag, its totally fine. I've tossed my main bag into plenty of rental trunks and never had an issue. Save that money for extra glass or lighting instead... your back will thank you later.


1

Share:
PhotographyPanel.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy