13/02/2026 3:05 am
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
Fujifilm Forum
4
Posts
5
Users
0
Reactions
116
Views
0
Hey everyone! I recently made the switch to the Fujifilm ecosystem with an X-T5 and a couple of those lovely compact primes like the 23mm f/2. I’m absolutely loving the film simulations, but I’m feeling a bit overwhelmed trying to decide which lens filters are actually worth the investment for this specific system.
I’ve heard that for some Fuji lenses, you actually need a protector filter to complete the weather sealing, which makes me lean toward a high-quality UV filter right away. However, I’ve also seen a lot of Fuji shooters using Black Mist or CineBloom filters to enhance that filmic look. I’m curious if those ever feel like 'overkill' when paired with recipes like Classic Negative or if they truly add that extra magic. Also, since I do a fair bit of outdoor shooting, I’m debating if a circular polarizer is a better first step than a variable ND filter, especially considering the smaller filter threads on these X-series lenses.
I want to keep my kit relatively light and not degrade the image quality of the X-Trans sensor. For those of you who have been shooting Fuji for a while, which 2 or 3 filters do you consider absolute must-haves in your bag?
4 Answers
10
13/02/2026 3:30 am
Similar situation here - I went through this exact same struggle when I first picked up my X-T5. Over the years, I've tried many different setups, but I always prioritize safety and value. I realized pretty quickly that cheap glass actually degrades that X-Trans sensor's sharpness, so I eventually invested in a B+W 43mm 010 UV-Haze MRC Nano Filter for my 23mm prime. Honestly, I feel like I gotta have that for the weather sealing peace of mind... or piece of mind? lol anyway, it keeps the dust out. I also experimented with the filmic look using a Tiffen 43mm Black Pro-Mist 1/8 Filter. I found that anything stronger than a 1/8 felt like overkill when I was already using heavy film sims. It gets kinda mushy. For outdoor shooting, I dont usually bother with NDs because of the fast electronic shutter, but I always carry a Hoya 43mm NXT Plus Circular Polarizer Filter for glare. It was basically the most practical way for me to keep my kit light without sacrificing quality. Good luck with the new setup!
3
13/02/2026 3:05 am
yo! so i think ur right about the uv filter for sealing—honestly its a cheap way to stay safe. but comparison-wise: black mist vs cpl? i personally find a cpl way more practical for outdoor glare. iirc fujis electronic shutter is fast enough that nd filters arent always needed. black mist is cool but maybe a bit niche? id say get a uv and a cpl first... way better value imo 👍
3
13/02/2026 3:40 am
Totally agree! Safety first:
1. Hoya NXT Plus UV Filter: Pro: Weather-sealing.
2. B+W XS-Pro HTC Kaesemann Circular Polarizer: Pro: Glare protection.
Dont risk ur sensor with cheap glass! 👍
2
23/03/2026 10:00 am
I spent way too much time looking at transmission charts when I first got into the Fuji system, honestly. Being super satisfied with the high-end protective glass and the circular polarizer I keep in my bag now makes the research worth it. Reliability is really the main focus:
- Reflection control. Ghosting during night shoots was a major issue with cheaper glass. My current setup has much better multi-coating and it basically eliminated those internal reflections. The 99.8 percent transmission rate is no joke.
- Mechanical build. Some budget rings tend to bind on the threads, but the ones I got feel way smoother and wont seize up in the cold.
- Weather sealing. After getting caught in a nasty coastal mist last month, seeing the moisture just bead off was a relief. It works well and kept the internals bone dry. Knowing the technical specs of your glass actually match the quality of that sensor makes a huge difference for long-term use. Feel free to ask if you want more data on coatings tho!
