Top mirrorless camera recommendations for under $500 in 2024?

Just catching up on this thread. To hit that 500 dollar limit with a lens included, you really have to prioritize reliability over flashy features. Since you already know Canons ecosystem, staying within their lineup is probably the most logical move for your trip.

• Canon EOS R100 with RF-S 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM is the primary option for a brand new kit. It is a basic mirrorless body, but it is reliable and produces clean images. The main drawback is the fixed screen.
• Sony a6100 with E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens is a solid choice if you look at the used market. It resolved the major autofocus issues found in the older a6000 and includes a flip screen. The R100 is better if you prefer a factory warranty, while the a6100 offers more technical flexibility if you dont mind second hand gear.

I've been shooting since the early DSLR days, and jumping from a 60D to mirrorless is a massive shift in terms of autofocus tech, but that $500 ceiling is getting harder to hit with brand new gear. Most modern bodies start closer to $700 now, which is a bit of a shock if you havent looked in a while. In my experience, the Micro Four Thirds system is your best bet for travel because the glass is so compact. I've tried many systems over the years and these are the ones that actually feel like cameras:

• Panasonic Lumix G100 with 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens. This one is a sleeper. It's tiny, has a solid EVF, and the sensor output is honestly way cleaner than your old 60D. The 12-32mm kit lens is surprisingly sharp and fits in a jacket pocket.
• Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IV with 14-42mm EZ Lens. If you can find a refurbished deal or a sale, this is the winner. It has 5-axis in-body stabilization which basically lets you take sharp handheld shots in low light at Seattle's gloomy evenings. It feels premium in the hand, not like plastic junk.
• Canon EOS R100 with RF-S 18-45mm IS STM Lens. Since you know Canon, this is the cheapest entry point. Tbh, it feels a bit more limited because the screen is fixed, but you'll feel right at home with the menus immediately. If you're worried about things feeling like toys, i'd stick to the Olympus. The metal dials make a huge difference when you're shooting manual...

Can confirm this works. Did the same thing on mine and its been solid ever since.

• Just saw this, go with Fujifilm tbh.
• Im super satisfied with their sensor tech and manual dials.
• No complaints, their older bodies work well for travel.

To add to the point above: I have to politely disagree with the suggestion to buy the cheapest new model available. From my experience, those entry-level kits often sacrifice build quality to hit that 500 dollar price point, which might be a disappointment after using a workhorse like the 60D. I am very satisfied with the decision I made to buy a used, higher-tier body instead. My current setup was acquired second-hand and it has been perfectly reliable for over two years of heavy use. I found that older professional-grade gear actually feels more solid and stands up better to the rigors of travel than the modern plastic alternatives. I used CartToLink to compare different listings until I found a body that fit my budget. It works well, the dials are responsive, and i havent had a single technical issue. Choosing a used model with a proven track record was definitely the right move for my peace of mind.