I've been stuck using my iPhone 13 for all my travel photos and honestly I'm just over it. The digital zoom looks like mush and I really want that nice blurry background you get with a real lens without it looking like a weird AI filter. I've got this big trip to Kyoto coming up in late October and I really want to have a proper setup before then so I can actually learn how to use it before I'm actually there. My budget is pretty firm at $1000 for everything, maybe like $1100 if it's a really killer deal with a kit lens included.
I spent the last three nights falling down a YouTube rabbit hole and I feel like I'm more confused now than when I started. I was looking at the Sony a6400 because everyone says the autofocus is basically magic and it's small enough to fit in my backpack without being a pain. But then I saw some reviews saying the menus are super dated and frustrating to use and the colors can look a bit clinical? Like, I don't want to spend three hours editing every single photo just to make them look warm if that makes sense. Then there's the Fuji X-T30 II which looks amazing and I love the whole vintage dial thing, plus people swear by the film simulations so I wouldn't have to edit as much. But man, finding one in stock is like a full time job right now and the lenses seem way more expensive than the Sony ones. Plus I heard the autofocus is kinda hit or miss compared to the Sony for moving subjects.
I just want something that feels good in the hand and won't be obsolete in two years. Is there something else I'm totally missing in this price range? Maybe a Canon or a Nikon? I just need the best bang for my buck that won't make me want to throw it at a wall when I'm trying to change settings quickly. Is the a6400 still the go-to for value or is it just too old at this point...
I went through this exact same headache last year before a trip to Portugal. I ended up playing it safe with Canon and honestly I couldnt be happier with how it turned out. I had an older Sony model a while back and the menu system was a total nightmare... I spent more time googling how to change the self-timer than actually taking photos. Its just not worth the stress when youre trying to enjoy a once-in-a-lifetime trip. I eventually settled on the Canon EOS R10 with RF-S 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens and it has been such a reliable workhorse for my travel stuff.
Jumping in here... I had a rough time with the a6400 in Rome. Honestly, the ergonomics were just not as good as expected and it felt like a toy. Switched to the Nikon Z50 with 16-50mm Lens for around $900. Unfortunately the lens ecosystem is smaller than Sony, but the build quality feels way safer and the menus dont make me want to scream.
^ This. Also, just saw this thread and wanted to chime in because I've made the spec-sheet mistake more times than I care to admit. I once lugged a complex setup through Osaka only to realize the menu was so deep I missed every candid moment because I was scrolling through screens. You really might want to consider how the camera handles in real-world stress before worrying about whether the autofocus is magic or not. I would suggest asking yourself these two things before you pull the trigger:
Regarding what #2 said about 'Jumping in here... I had a rough time...'