Best camera for food photography right now?

Re: "Bump - same question here" - saw this earlier but just now responding. Honestly... it's a bit disappointing to see everyone recommending these tiny mirrorless cameras that tend to overheat during a long session. When you're trying to capture the perfect shot before the food gets cold, reliability is everything and some of these suggestions just aren't as good as expected for real work. The thread basically boils down to old DSLRs vs. flashy new mirrorless gear. I've had issues with the cheap Sony stuff mentioned earlier feeling a bit like toys. If you want something sturdy, maybe look at the Canon EOS 90D Body. It's a tank and wont shut down on you. Unfortunately, it's bulkier than the Sony a6400, but the battery life is way better. Another option is the Fujifilm X-T4 Mirrorless Digital Camera which has great colors for food, but the menus are kind of a headache compared to Canon. Stick to gear that wont fail you mid-shoot. Holler if you want more info on lenses for these!

Bump - same question here

Tbh, I’m still learning the ropes, but I kinda disagree with the push for those super fast mirrorless Sonys. For food photography, it’s not like the taco is gonna run away, right? I found that going for a slightly older or entry-level full-frame gave me way better "vibes" for way less money than a top-tier setup. Here’s what I did to stay way under that $1500 limit:
* I grabbed a refurbished Canon EOS RP directly from the site. It's full-frame, and the colors honestly look so much tastier than my phone shots.
* Instead of a fancy macro lens, I just use a basic Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 STM. It’s super cheap and the blur is great.
* I spent the saved cash on a tripod with a lateral arm for those overhead shots. I mean, having a bigger sensor just makes the background blur look more natural, you know? Well actually, I'm definitely not a pro yet, but it helped my photos look "expensive" without actually being expensive. Does that make sense?

Same here!

Honestly? My Nikon D3300 did great. Under $500 used. Spend the rest on good lenses.

Skip full-frame. Micro Four Thirds like Olympus offers incredible macro lenses – cheaper, lighter, and honestly, depth of field's razor thin enough as it is. Had issues with Sony's overheating, personally.

Food photography requires intense lighting. In my experience, prioritize equipment safety certifications (UL, CSA). Overheating is a real fire hazard. Consider investing in fire-resistant backdrop materials instead of chasing the 'best' camera. A used Sony A6000 series with proper lighting safety measures is a much safer bet than a fancy camera prone to overheating.

Forget breaking the bank! A used Sony a6000 ($400ish) plus a decent macro lens will give you AMAZING food pics. Save the rest for props...and ingredients! 😉

Instead of chasing the 'best,' consider long-term lens investment. I've tried many bodies, but good glass lasts. A used Sony Alpha body with a quality macro lens will get you stunning results. Over the years, I've found lighting is more crucial than the camera itself. Don't overlook that! Consult a pro photographer before buying; it's a big investment.

Down here in humid Florida, preventing lens fogging is key! I'm happy with my Sony a6000; its smaller sensor seems to adjust to the dew point better. No complaints so far!

Sony's popular, but Canon's glass holds value better long-term, based on resale trends. Research both!

Food pics, huh? I'm a total newbie with cameras, but have you considered just rocking your phone? Seriously! Good lighting & composition are key. My buddy uses his iPhone and gets AMAZING results. Before dropping $1500, maybe try a cheap ring light and some YouTube tutorials? Save that cash for car parts!

Sony a6400. Fast autofocus, like a proper sports car. Decent option under $1000.