Ugh so I am trying to find a camera for my trip to Maine next month and I am literally losing my mind over this. I have $500 total and that has to include the lens too because I dont have any gear at all. I was looking at the Sony ones like the a6000 but then someone online said its too old and the autofocus isnt good anymore but then another site said its the best for beginners so I am just stuck.
My logic was that I just wanted something better than my iPhone 13 for landscape shots but every time I look at a new camera the price is like $800 or more just for the body. Is there even anything good left for under $500 or am I just dreaming? I saw some Olympus cameras too but I dont understand what micro four thirds means vs a regular camera sensor. It all sounds like a different language to be honest. I just want something that isnt huge and heavy to carry around the trails.
I checked ebay and facebook marketplace but honestly I am scared of getting scammed since I dont know how to check if a lens is broken or has mold or whatever. Are there any actual mirrorless cameras that are worth it in 2024 for five hundred bucks or should I just give up and use my phone...
Honestly, $500 is a bit of a squeeze for a brand new mirrorless kit these days, but its definitely doable if you look at the right places. Dont worry about the a6000 being old. For landscapes in Maine, you arent tracking fast-moving birds, so the autofocus is still totally fine for stills. I still think the Sony a6000 with 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens is a decent option because that sensor holds up well for the price. If you want something smaller for the trails, look at the Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark II with 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R Lens. Micro Four Thirds basically just means the sensor is slightly smaller than the Sony ones, which allows the camera and lenses to be tiny. To avoid getting scammed on eBay, just buy from sites like MPB or KEH. They inspect everything and give a warranty, so you wont have to stress about mold or broken parts. Its a much safer bet for a first timer.
Re: "Quick reply while I have a sec. I..."
To add to the point above: I actually have to disagree a bit on the Canon M50. Its a fine camera for vlogging but the build quality always felt a bit like a toy to me, especially if you are hitting the trails. In my experience, those Maine coastal winds and humidity require something that feels a bit more solid in your hands. I've tried many systems over the years and for a $500 budget, I usually point people toward older Fujifilm bodies. I remember my first trip out there; those physical dials made it so much easier to adjust my settings when my fingers were cold. Plus, the colors are just gorgeous for those forest greens and ocean blues. To avoid the scams you mentioned, just buy from a used specialist like MPB or KEH. They inspect everything and give a warranty so you dont have to worry. Here is what I would look for:
Building on the earlier suggestion, I think we're overcomplicating this for someone who just wants better photos than an iPhone. In my experience, you're gonna spend way too much money if you follow the big brand hype. I've tried many systems over the years and honestly, I think you should just look at Panasonic. Here is my take:
Quick reply while I have a sec. I went through this exact same headache when I started hiking more. I used to carry a huge setup until my neck started killing me... basically lugging a heavy brick around for miles. If you want something reliable that wont blow the budget, check out the Canon M line. Tech snobs say it is dead because Canon shifted to a newer mount, but that just makes it a total bargain for beginners right now.