Honestly I'm kind of hitting a wall with my X-T5 and it's making me so anxious because I spent a fortune on this body. I've been using the 18-55mm kit lens for a few months now but every time I get home and look at my landscape shots on a big monitor they just look... mushy? Like the 40 megapixel sensor is just too much for this glass and I'm losing all that fine detail in the trees and rocks. I have this huge hiking trip to Olympic National Park coming up in three weeks and I'm terrified I'm gonna come back with a bunch of blurry garbage. I really need something that can actually handle the resolution of this sensor.
I was looking at the 10-24mm but I heard the weather sealing is iffy on the older ones and the new one is pricey, then someone told me to just get the 14mm prime but I worry I'll miss having a zoom for framing. My budget is around 900 bucks maybe a bit more if it's truly worth it. Should I go for the 16-80mm or is that just gonna have the same softness issues? Or maybe the Viltrox 13mm? I just want my shots to look sharp for once and I'm honestly so frustrated that I'm considering selling the whole kit if I can't find a lens that actually works. What are you guys actually using for wide landscape stuff that doesnt fall apart at the edges?
Honestly, you might want to consider staying away from the 16-80mm lens. In my experience, it really struggles at the edges on that 40MP sensor and might just frustrate you more. I would suggest looking at the Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR instead. Make sure you get the newer WR version specifically for the weather sealing since Olympic is basically a rainforest and you will definitely need that protection. Be careful with your aperture settings on the X-T5 body. You will start seeing diffraction much earlier than on older sensors. I have found that shooting past f/8 can actually make images look softer, which is likely contributing to that mushy look you mentioned. Tbh, if you want absolute detail, the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR is the gold standard for zooms, though it is quite heavy for long hikes. Worth it for the results tho.
Regarding what #1 said about "Honestly, you might want to consider staying away..."
Building on the earlier suggestion, i saw this earlier but just now getting a chance to sit down and respond. I totally get the anxiety about that sensor! The X-T5 is an absolute beast... it’s fantastic because you get so much raw detail, but it really exposes every tiny flaw in the glass. There was a point where I was so frustrated that I almost went back to my old 26MP body because everything looked soft. Total reliability and amazing sharpness are key if you want to keep that 40MP sensor happy. Personally, the Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R has been a total sleeper hit for me. I know you mentioned wanting a zoom, but this prime is built so well and the optical quality is just phenomenal. There is basically zero distortion, which is huge for those wide landscape shots! During my big hiking trip last year, the fear of coming home with soft files was real, but this lens delivered every single time. Technically speaking, the 40MP sensor has much smaller pixels, so the lens glass has to be way more precise to resolve detail. Your kit lens just wasnt designed for that kind of density. If you really feel you need a zoom and can push the budget a bit, the Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR is what I finally settled on for my safe setup. It is heavier, but the results are stunning and the weather sealing is top-tier, which is vital for Olympic National Park. You really dont want to gamble with a lens that might let moisture in or give you mushy edges when you're out there in the mist!