Hey Fuji X shooters! I'm trying to decide which TTartisan lens is the best bang for my buck for my X-T3. I've heard good things about their build quality. Anyone have experience with the 35mm f/1.4 vs. the 50mm f/1.2 on Fuji? I'm mostly shooting street photography and portraits. Which one do you think is sharper and more versatile overall for Fuji X mount?
I've been thinking about this thread and I totally agree with Guinevere about the gamble factor. I actually had a weird experience with a budget manual lens I bought for my current setup last year. On paper it looked perfect, but when I tried to put it on, it was way too tight. Like, I actually felt metal-on-metal resistance that made me cringe. I was terrified it was gonna mess up the mount on my camera body. I realized that even if the glass is sharp, if the physical compatibility is off by even a fraction of a millimeter, it can be a nightmare. I ended up sending it back immediately. These days I'm way more cautious about how a lens actually fits onto the body, cause saving a few bucks isnt worth a broken mount, ngl. It really made me prioritize how well a lens is actually machined over just looking at the f-stop numbers. Sometimes the best bang for your buck can end up being pretty expensive if it damages your camera!
Ok so, I actually picked up one of these a while back to run some proper bench tests - mostly because I'm pretty cautious about internal element alignment on these budget manual builds. From my experience, while the center resolution is surprisingly high, the real-world performance can be a bit of a gamble. On the copy I tested, I noticed some pretty significant decentering - like, one side of the frame just wouldn't hit critical sharpness no matter how much I stopped down. It’s a common issue with lower-tier manufacturing tolerances. Tbh, if you’re using it for street photography, the field curvature can also be a bit tricky; it’s not a flat plane of focus, which makes shooting subjects off-center a real challenge. I spent hours checking longitudinal chromatic aberration too, and while it's "fine" for the price, the purple fringing in high-contrast transitions was definitely more than I'd like for professional work. Just make sure you do a proper brick-wall test as soon as yours arrives to ensure the optical axis is actually straight - it’s the only way to be sure you’re getting the performance you’re paying for. (At least that's my standard workflow for these!)
Helpful thread 👍
Hey there! I've actually used both on my X-T2. For street, honestly, the TTartisan 35mm f/1.4 is where it's at. It's more compact, and the slightly wider field of view is just more versatile for capturing scenes quickly. The 50mm f/1.2 is amazing for portraits, super dreamy bokeh! But it's bulkier, and you need more space. Sharpness-wise, they're both pretty decent stopped down a bit. But for overall versatility on Fuji, I'd lean towards the 35mm. Hope this helps!
Hey! While the 35mm is popular, I actually had issues with the TTartisan 50mm f/1.2 on my X-Pro2, and honestly, it wasn't as good as expected wide open – pretty soft. I think you'll find the 35mm more forgiving for street.
That said, have you considered the Viltrox 33mm f/1.4? It's autofocus, which is a game-changer for street, and sharpness is excellent even wide open. It's only a little more expensive than the TTartisan, and IMO, the autofocus makes it worth it, especially if you're shooting moving subjects. The manual focus on the TTartisan can be tough to nail quickly. Just a thought! Hope this helps!
Hey Fuji X shooter!
While everyone's talking about sharpness and price, I think it's crucial to consider something often overlooked: **reliability and potential safety issues** with cheaper, fully manual lenses like the TTartisan. I've been shooting for years, and I've seen some things, let me tell you!
Think about it: these lenses are often manufactured to a price point. QC can be... variable. While the *build* might feel solid, the long-term durability and internal tolerances are something to consider. I'm not saying they'll fall apart immediately, but be aware.
For street and portraits, both the 35mm f/1.4 and 50mm f/1.2 are viable, but here's where my concern comes in. Since they're fully manual, you're relying *entirely* on your own focusing and aperture settings. On a bright sunny day, misjudging your aperture on the 50mm f/1.2 (which lets in a LOT of light!) could lead to overexposed shots, yeah, but also potentially to issues with your sensor if you're constantly blasting it with excessive light. Unlikely, sure, but *possible*.
Also, if you're shooting in challenging conditions (dust, rain – street photography, right?), a lens with proper weather sealing (which the TTartisan lenses lack) is *essential* for protecting your camera body. I've seen cameras bricked by even slight moisture intrusion. It's not worth the risk, IMO.
So, while the initial price is attractive, factor in the potential long-term risks: potential sensor damage from constant overexposure due to manual control, and the lack of weather sealing which could damage your expensive Fuji X-T3.
My recommendation? If budget is tight, maybe look at used Fuji lenses. You'll get autofocus, better reliability, and often weather sealing. The Fuji 35mm f/2 WR is a *fantastic* lens for street and portraits, and you can often find it used for around the same price as a new TTartisan. The 50mm f/2 is another good option. You're paying for peace of mind and better quality in the long run.
Just something to think about beyond the initial cost and sharpness debates! Safety first!
Hope this helps!
Hey! Both lenses are fun, but honestly, I'd consider your budget first. The TTartisan 50mm f/1.2 is usually pricier, and from what I've seen, the sharpness isn't *that* much better than the 35mm f/1.4 to justify the extra cost, especially for street. For Fuji, you're also cropping in a bit, so the 'defects' get amplified, unfortunately.
Also, think about getting a used Fuji lens instead! You might find a great deal on a used Fuji 35mm f/2, which would probably outperform either TTartisan lens in sharpness and autofocus speed, and for not much more money. Just a thought! Hope this helps!
Hey! While TTartisan's build is decent for the price, have you considered alternatives in that manual lens space? Brands like 7Artisans or Meike offer similar options. Honestly, it's worth comparing specs and reviews across all three. Sometimes you find hidden gems, and the slightly different coatings can make a big difference on Fuji's sensor. Don't just limit yourself! I've seen some really sharp images from all of them! Good luck!
Hey everyone! I've been seeing all the comments on the TTartisan lenses, and it's a mixed bag, for sure. But I haven't seen anyone mention DIY calibration, which can make a HUGE difference, especially with these budget-friendly, fully manual lenses.
Basically, these lenses *can* have some sample variation, so don't be afraid to tweak them yourself. You can adjust the focus throw or even shim the lens mount to dial in perfect focus at your most used distances. There are tons of tutorials online, and it's way cheaper than sending it off to a lens tech (unless you're really uncomfortable with it).
I've done it on a few vintage lenses, and honestly, the improvement was night and day. Makes sense to get the 35mm or 50mm, try it out, and then consider a DIY tune-up before writing it off! Just my two cents. Good luck!