I’ve been staring at my Z6 for like an hour trying to decide which glass to grab before my buddies wedding in October. I am doing the portraits for them as a gift and I really want them to look sharp and professional. So I was thinking about the Z 85mm f1.8 S because literally every review says its the gold standard for this system but then I started second guessing myself because the venue is this kinda small rustic barn and I am worried 85mm is gonna be way too tight if I am stuck in a corner or trying to get a full body shot.
My logic was maybe the 50mm f1.8 S would be safer for the tighter spaces but then I see those side by side shots and the 85mm just has that compression that looks so much better for the actual headshots. I read online that the 85mm is technically superior for bokeh but some people on another forum said the 50mm is actually more characterful whatever that means. Budget is a real thing too, I really cant go over about $900 right now so the f1.2 is totally out of the question haha. I also looked at the Viltrox 85mm because its way cheaper but I am kinda nervous about the autofocus hitting correctly on the Z6 during the actual ceremony. Is the 85mm S really worth the extra cash over the 50 if I can only bring one lens?
Just catching up on this thread after a long day. Ive shot a ton of weddings in those cramped, rustic barns and honestly, space is your biggest enemy. Like someone mentioned, that 85mm compression is beautiful, but you're gonna be miserable trying to use it for anything other than tight headshots in a small room. In my experience, versatility wins every time when you're the only one shooting. If your budget is $900, I'd seriously look at the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 for the Nikon Z system. I've tried many setups over the years, and a fast 2.8 zoom is a lifesaver for weddings. It gives you that 75mm for portraits and the 28mm for the wider venue shots without you having to swap glass every five minutes. It hits that professional look without the S-line prime price tag. If you're strictly a prime shooter tho, maybe look at the Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.8 S. It's well within your budget and lets you capture the whole scene. I also keep a Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 in my bag as a backup... its tiny, cheap, and surprisingly sharp for the price. Dont get too hung up on the character debate. At the end of the day, your friends just want sharp photos where nobody's head is cut off because you couldn't back up far enough in a tight corner.
Building on the earlier suggestion, I actually had a pretty disappointing experience at a rustic wedding last year trying to use just an 85mm. I felt so restricted. The barn was so cramped that I was basically hugging the walls just to get the couple in frame. I ended up missing some really candid moments because I was too busy trying to find enough distance to focus. I also tried a cheaper lens once and had issues with it missing focus during the ceremony. On a Z6, you really want that native S-line reliability. Here is what I would actually do:
saw this pop up this morning and it honestly brings back memories of my first few wedding gigs. in my experience shooting in those tiny rustic barns is always a nightmare for space. you think you want that 85mm compression—and trust me the Nikon NIKKOR Z 85mm f1.8 S is basically the gold standard for skin tones—but when youre backed against a hay bale you might regret the fixed focal length. over the years ive realized the character people mention with the Nikon NIKKOR Z 50mm f1.8 S is really just how it captures the vibe of the room better. if youre worried about being stuck in a corner tho... look at the Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-75mm f2.8. i know you wanted a prime but for weddings in weird venues its a lifesaver. its right in your budget and lets you grab a wide shot then zoom into 75mm for that portrait look without swapping glass. honestly versatility is king when youre doing a favor for friends and cant control the space.