So I’ve been staring at my cart for like three days now and I just can't pull the trigger on a lens because I keep flip-flopping. I’m shooting my niece’s graduation portraits in a few weeks—shes graduating high school here in Chicago and we’re doing a whole park session—and I really need something better than the kit lens on my Z5. I’m working with a pretty strict budget, like $350 max, so I’m definitely looking at the used market or maybe some of those third party brands I’ve seen people mention lately.
My initial thought was just to grab the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S because everyone calls it the nifty fifty and says its a must-have. My logic was that it’s wide enough that I wont have to stand a mile away if we’re in a crowded spot, and it seems like a safe bet for general use too. But then I started reading some threads on reddit and people are swearing that the 85mm is the only way to go for 'real' portraits because of the compression and how it slims the face down. I found a used Viltrox 85mm f1.8 that fits my budget, but then I read a couple reviews saying the autofocus can be a bit hunt-y compared to native glass.
That’s where I’m getting stuck. If I go with the 50mm am I gonna regret not having that extra reach and bokeh? Or if I go for the 85mm am I gonna find myself constantly backing into traffic just to get her whole outfit in the frame? I’m also seeing people suggest the older AF-S lenses with an FTZ adapter, but adding the cost of the adapter basically kills my budget anyway so that seems like a dead end. Its frustrating because I want that professional look but I just dont have the a thousand bucks to drop on the high end glass right now. Does the 50mm actually hold up for tight headshots or does it distort the nose too much? I keep looking at comparison photos and one minute I'm convinced the 50 is fine and the next I'm sure I need the 85...
Unfortunately, finding a perfect Z lens under $350 is tough. I had issues with the Viltrox AF 85mm f/1.8 Z autofocus being slower than native glass, which was not as good as expected for portraits.
I've been using the Z5 for a while and faced this exact dilemma before a family session in Chicago last year. I eventually purchased a used Viltrox 85mm f/1.8 Z-Mount Mark II and I've been very satisfied with the results. While some users report slower autofocus, I've found it works perfectly well for graduation portraits where the subject isn't moving too fast. The 85mm focal length is far more flattering for facial features compared to a 50mm. In my experience, the 50mm can sometimes cause slight perspective distortion during tight headshots. Regarding your space concerns, the 85mm compression is excellent for isolating your subject from park crowds. I've been quite happy with the bokeh quality and overall sharpness. For a budget under $350, it's a very capable alternative to expensive native glass. I've also heard good things about the Yongnuo 85mm f/1.8 DF DSM Z-Mount for similar situations.
@Reply #2 - good point! Honestly i was in your shoes a few months ago and totally panicked about the same thing. If you are worried about the 85mm reach but want that pro bokeh, you should definitely check out the Meike 85mm f/1.8 STM Full Frame Z Mount. It is literally so cheap and the images are amazing! I love it for outdoor sessions because you get those creamy backgrounds without spending a fortune. I know you are worried about backing into traffic lol but Chicago parks are huge! Just tell her to walk a few steps away and you're golden. For tight headshots, 85mm is just way better than the 50mm because it doesnt do that weird nose stretching thing. Seriously, for under 200 bucks its such a steal! Youll have plenty of cash left over for extra batteries or a fancy camera strap too.