I’m planning a two-week trip to Japan soon and I really want to take advantage of the portability of my Micro Four Thirds setup. I’m trying to decide if I should bring a versatile 'do-it-all' zoom like the Olympus 12-100mm f/4, or if I’d be better off with a couple of tiny f/1.8 primes for those low-light evening walks in the city. Weight is a huge factor for me since I'll be doing a lot of walking, but I don't want to sacrifice image quality for landscapes. For those who travel light, what is your 'holy grail' lens combination that balances size and performance? Which lenses are absolutely permanent fixtures in your travel bag?
Ok so, I've spent the last decade lugging MFT gear all over Tokyo and Kyoto, and honestly? I've made some mistakes. I used to swear by the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100mm f/4.0 IS PRO, but unfortunately, it felt like a literal brick after walking 15 miles a day. The stabilization is legendary, but the weight is just NOT as good as expected for a "portable" system. Tbh, it kinda defeated the purpose of MFT for me. For your Japan trip, I highkey recommend a split setup. My "holy grail" now is the Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm f/1.7 ASPH for those moody evening walks—it’s tiny and the rendering is gorgeous. Pair that with something like the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm f/4.0-5.6 II for daytime. Sure, it’s not as sharp as the PRO glass, but its SO much lighter and easier to carry. Lessons learned the hard way: your back matters more than pixel peeping at 100mm! gl!
Seconding the recommendation above! Honestly, those heavy 'pro' zooms are overkill if you're hitting 20k steps a day in Tokyo. I'm pretty budget-conscious, so i dont think you need to drop a fortune on glass to get great Japan shots. Plus, carrying a heavy bag around the subway is a nightmare, trust me. If you want a 'do-it-all' vibe without the brick weight of the 12-100mm mentioned earlier, look at the Panasonic Lumix G Vario 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6 II ASPH. POWER O.I.S.. It's way lighter than the pro zooms and usually much cheaper, especially if you buy it used on eBay or something. It basically covers everything you'd need for landscapes during the day. But for the 'holy grail' combo on a budget? I'd actually suggest the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/1.8. It's super tiny, looks classy, and that 35mm equivalent field of view is *perfect* for narrow Japanese alleys and food shots. Plus, it's fast enough for those neon night markets. If you need a bit more reach for cheap, the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 R is basically made of plastic but it weighs like 190 grams and costs next to nothing. You can usually find them for under $100... it's a steal tbh. Basically, my advice is: don't overthink it or overspend on 'Pro' gear if weight is ur main concern. These consumer-grade primes are literally the reason MFT exists. They're sharp enough for travel photos, and your neck will thank you after day three. Japan's hilly (lots of stairs!), so every gram counts, seriously. Hope this helps and have the best time!! 👍
To add to the point above: it seems the thread is split between the heavy do-it-all glass and the tiny primes. Tbh, carrying a brick like the 12-100 around Tokyo can really kill the mood by lunchtime. I would suggest you be careful about weather sealing tho... Japan can be surprisingly wet and those tiny f/1.8 primes usually arent protected. For a technical middle ground, here is what I usually recommend for reliability:
Story time: I went through this last year! I swapped the heavy zoom for the Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 II ASPH. and Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8. Honestly, the 20mm is sooo sharp and way better for low-light than f/4 zooms. I totaly found that faster primes help keep the ISO low to maintain dynamic range on the MFT sensor. Plus, the weight reduction was a literal lifesaver! gl 👍
Late to the party but this whole thread is 💯. Glad I found it.