Recommendation for ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Recommendation for a high-quality UV filter for Leica Summilux lenses?

3 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
137 Views
0
Topic starter

Hey everyone! I recently finally bit the bullet and added a 50mm Summilux-M ASPH to my kit, and I’m absolutely in love with the rendering. However, I’ve found myself being a bit overly precious with it lately. Every time I’m out shooting street photography or in slightly dusty conditions, I get a hit of anxiety about a stray finger touch or a bit of grit scratching that beautiful front element. It’s a massive investment, so I’m leaning towards getting a high-quality UV filter for peace of mind, but I’m really torn on which way to go.

I’ve traditionally been someone who avoids filters because I hate the idea of putting a $100 piece of glass in front of a $4,000 lens. I’m terrified of losing that legendary micro-contrast or dealing with nasty ghosting when shooting into the light. I’ve been researching the B+W XS-Pro MRC2 Nano series, which seems to be a gold standard, and of course, there are Leica’s own UVa II filters. Some purists swear that the Leica-branded ones are the only way to ensure the color balance remains identical, while others say you’re just paying for the name.

I have a couple of specific concerns: first, I want to make sure the filter is slim enough that it doesn't cause any vignetting or interfere with the built-in lens hood on the Summilux. Second, I’ve heard some filters can actually cause a weird reflection with the sensor on digital M bodies.

For those of you who regularly shoot with Summilux glass, what is your go-to for protection? Have you noticed any real-world degradation in image quality or flare resistance with the Leica UVa II versus something like a Breakthrough Photography X4 or a Hoya HD3? I’d love to hear your recommendations on what provides the best balance of protection and optical transparency.


3 Answers
11

For your situation, I totally get it. I used to buy only Leica filters but realized the tech in others is basically the same for way less cash. Tbh, I think you dont need the "Leica tax." • Hoya 46mm HD3 UV Filter - super tough, around $50.
B+W 46mm UV Protection Filter (010) MRC Nano XS-Pro - slim, no vignetting, about $70. Anyway, lesson learned: expensive names dont always mean better coatings!


3

sooo i totally feel u on the anxiety... that 50mm lux is basically a masterpiece and scratching it would be a nightmare. honestly, the whole filter debate is kinda wild but here's the technical reality: digital sensors are basically mirrors, and putting a flat glass in front can cause some nasty internal reflections. basically, the light hits the sensor, bounces back to the filter, and then back to the sensor. ugh. in my experience, you aren't gonna lose that legendary rendering if you use top-tier glass. over the years, I've found that the coating is everything for maintaining micro-contrast. - multicoated glass: it's literally essential to keep flare down and contrast high
- brass rings: aluminum tends to bind to the lens threads which is a total pain in the field
- slim
profiles: keeps the hood functioning without vignetting tbh i usually just go with the leica branded ones or the high-end b+w glass. the leica ones are designed specifically for the m-mount clearances so they dont mess with the hood. i havent noticed any real color shift either. just make sure it has the mrc or nano type coatings so it's easier to wipe away thumbprints. gl!


1

+1


Share:
PhotographyPanel.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Contact Us | Privacy Policy