19/05/2026 5:25 pm
Topic starter
Notifications
Clear all
Photography Tips
2
Posts
4
Users
0
Reactions
4
Views
0
I finally pulled the trigger on a Z8 after saving for like a year and now im staring at my old f-mount lenses wondering if I should just sell them all lol. Im planning a hiking trip to the Dolomites in late June and I need a solid wide angle for those huge mountain vistas. Im torn between the 14-24mm f/2.8 S and the 14-30mm f/4. The 2.8 is obviously the pro choice but its so heavy and expensive and I honestly dont know if I need that extra stop for landscapes if im using a tripod anyway. On the other hand the 14-30 takes normal filters which is a huge plus for my long exposures. Is the image quality gap really that big on a 45mp sensor?
11
19/05/2026 5:26 pm
Honestly, you are gonna be so happy with the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm f/4 S. This lens works incredibly well on the Nikon Z8 and it has been my go-to for hiking over the last year. Since you are heading to the Dolomites, saving weight is huge. That Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S is a total tank, but carrying it up a mountain when you are already using a tripod feels like overkill. A few things that make the f/4 version a winner:
- Normal 82mm filter threads allow for easy long exposures without those bulky, expensive square filter setups.
- The size is perfect for travel and it tucks away easily in a small bag.
- Image quality on the 45mp sensor is surprisingly sharp, especially once you stop down to f/8 where most landscapes live anyway. The gap in quality really isnt as massive as the price tag suggests. Unless you are shooting the Milky Way without a tracker, that extra stop of light doesnt buy you much. Stick with the lighter option and spend the leftover cash on some nice filters like the NiSi V7 Filter Holder Kit or a better tripod. Youll be much more satisfied when you are halfway up a trail and your pack doesnt feel like a lead weight. If you need more info on how it handles flare or sunstars, just ask!
